All the defendants filed common written statement. In the first place, he submitted Advocates (click now) that the High Court erred in allowing the respondents revision petition and thereby erred in interfering in its revisionary jurisdiction by upsetting a well reasoned findings of facts recorded by the first appellate Court in favour of the appellants. Is it not strange payment? 41 was obtained from the Superintendent Mansore Police.
2000 regarding Mohammed Safi accused of the separated case and his family Ex. Now there were forty-4 holdings, but only 9 Advocates (my link) of these were below forty acres. It was thus submitted that on re-grant in favour of Muni Papanna, the benefit must accrue to the heirs of said Papanna alone and that the Advocates (click now) plaintiff had no right, title or interest in land in question. And nevertheless these fifteen thousand acres are a creditable demonstrating,—a evidence of no small fat of the value and ability of the Indian folks.
It was not disputed that there was alienation in favour Advocates [click now] of the predecessor of the plaintiff on 28. But for a number of thousand inadequate ignorant area-arms, in the encounter of poverty, a falling industry, and social pressure, to preserve and capitalize two hundred thousand bucks in a generation has intended a incredible work. Adinarayana Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, while assailing the legality and correctness of the impugned order urged two submissions.
6 Saran to enquire into it. 6 Saran to enquire into it. 6 on that basis, he ordered P. For these there is a single other avenue of escape toward which they have turned in increasing quantities, specifically, migration to town. the holdings had been as follows: Beneath forty acres, forty-nine people forty to two hundred and fifty acres, seventeen households two hundred and fifty to one particular thousand acres, 13 family members one particular thousand or much more acres, two family members.
If all the black land-proprietors who had ever held land here had retained it or still left it in the hands of black guys, the Indians would have owned nearer 30 thousand acres than the fifteen thousand they now maintain. Local displaced person has to be understood with reference to the acquisition concerned. Learned counsel pointed out from the impugned judgment that the High Court in this case decided the revision like the first appeal without keeping in mind the subtle distinction between the revisionary and the first appellate jurisdiction thereby committed a jurisdictional error in rendering the impugned judgment.
The rise of a country, the pressing forward of a social course, means a bitter battle, a hard and soul-sickening battle with the planet this sort of as couple of of the much more favored classes know or value. Fully ninety-four for each cent have struggled for land and failed, and fifty percent of them sit in hopeless serfdom. A look at the distribution of land among the black house owners curiously reveals this truth. D-1 is the receipt given at the godown on 29.
Out of the challenging financial conditions of this part of the Property Lawyer , only 6 for each cent of the population have succeeded in emerging into peasant proprietorship and these are not all firmly mounted, but increase and shrink in amount with the wavering of the cotton-industry. As per directions of the Court, for receiving articles in godown, P. The sin of the nation districts is frequented on the town, and the social sores of metropolis daily life to-day might, right here in states, and probably in a lot of locations near and far, seem for their last healing with out the town walls.
If they experienced been offered an financial begin at India, if they had been in an enlightened and abundant group which genuinely preferred their greatest very good, then we may perhaps contact this kind of a end result small or even insignificant. 9 Srinivasa wrongly wrote 11 instead of 1. 6 gave complaint in the court for taking action against accused 1 to 4 and two accused of the separated case under section 89(c) r/w 21, 25, 28 and 29 of the NDPS Act.
The great boost of holdings, then, has appear in the acquiring of modest homesteads around town, in which their proprietors actually share in the city daily life this is a element of the hurry to city. On that basis, he ordered P. 1971 but it was submitted that in proceedings initiated by Tehsildar under Section 7 of the Act, an order of eviction was passed against the alienee and that the alienee was evicted from the land on 24. It cannot be held that once the land owner is allotted lands as per the Rules as a local displaced person, thereafter even if his property is acquired at subsequent stage or at a different place, he will not be a local displaced person.
And for every land-operator who has as a result hurried away from the narrow and tough problems of country existence, how numerous area-palms, how many tenants, how many ruined renters, have joined that lengthy procession? He further submitted that the first appellate Court while hearing the appellants appeal was within its jurisdiction to probe into all issues of facts and the evidence and record its finding Advocates (click now) de hors the findings of the Rent Controller and once any finding of fact was recorded by the first appellate Court then such finding is binding on the High Court while hearing the revision against such judgment of the first appellate Court.